SVG
Commentary
Wall Street Journal

Another Attempt at Peace in Ukraine

Despite Trump’s plan, the West lacks the unity of purpose to put pressure on Putin.

walter_russell_mead
walter_russell_mead
Ravenel B. Curry III Distinguished Fellow in Strategy and Statesmanship
Walter Russell Mead
Walter Russell Mead Wall Street Journal
Caption
Russia's President Vladimir Putin chairs a Security Council meeting via a videoconference at the Kremlin in Moscow on November 21, 2025. (Getty Images)

President Trump’s latest foray into Ukraine diplomacy is having the usual effects. When Mr. Trump’s 28-point plan, twice the size of Woodrow Wilson’s famous Fourteen Points in World War I, first leaked, supporters of stronger Western backing for Ukraine were appalled. Mr. Trump’s most impassioned critics returned to their happy place, reviving Russiagate charges that because of either blackmail or ideological affinity, the American president is a Putin fanboy, eager to do the Kremlin’s bidding. More soberly, Ukraine’s supporters on both sides of the Atlantic argued that Mr. Trump wasn’t bringing the West’s enormous advantages in wealth, population and productive capacity to bear on Russia.

Over the weekend, things changed. By the time Secretary of State Marco Rubio briefed the press Sunday, the original 28-point document had evolved. Like the U.S. Constitution in the mind of a liberal Supreme Court justice, the proposals were less a fixed set of rules than, as Mr. Rubio put it: “a living, breathing document.” What critics once called an ultimatum—that Ukraine must accept the proposals by Thanksgiving or face a cutoff of American aid—transitioned into a guideline. Rather than an American diktat that all parties must accept, the proposals were more like talking points. Ukraine, Russia, North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies: Everybody gets to join in the sausage-making process out of which, the Trump administration hopes, a final agreement will emerge.

Read the full article in The Wall Street Journal.